APL vs Nike: Which Is Better?

Shoes are an essential part of any athlete’s game, providing the foundation for movement and protection against impact and strain. When it comes to choosing between sports shoe powerhouses APL and Nike, there’s a lot to consider to determine which brand best suits your needs and preferences.

I’ve compared these two brands across a range of factors to help you decide which one is likely to be the better fit for you.

Comparison Table Between APL And Nike:

Shoe TypesRunning, basketball, lifestyle, fitnessRunning, basketball, training, lifestyle, hiking, specialized (e.g. golf, soccer)
Price Range$220 – $450$40 – $500+
Best Known ForInnovative performance technology, luxurious feelVariety, innovation, brand recognition and loyalty
Comfort and FitSock-like fit from TechLoom upperVariety to accommodate different foot shapes
Durability and PerformanceExcellent energy return and responsivenessDurable and good performance across range of activities
Design and StyleDistinct athletic aesthetic with bold colorsRange includes lifestyle and retro styles
PopularityAmong serious athletes for innovative performance techMass mainstream appeal and brand recognition
Target MarketTechLoom ProAir Force 1

APL Overview:

Founded in 2009 by Adam and Ryan Goldston, Athletic Propulsion Labs is known for revolutionizing athletic shoes by seamlessly blending performance, comfort, and style.

APL Founders

Their shoes feature a balance of cushioning and support through the use of responsive Propel Foam in the midsole. This proprietary foam provides soft, pillowy cushioning while still maintaining a firm, responsive feel underfoot.

The flexible TechLoom woven upper material is another key feature of APL shoes. This lightweight, breathable upper allows the foot to move and flex naturally with each stride. Wearers remark how the TechLoom upper “moves with you” for uninhibited motion.

APL shoes strike a balance between plush cushioning and ground connection. They absorb impact comfortably without excessive softness that can undermine performance.

Across the board, wearers praise the secure, sock-like fit of APL shoes that keeps the foot locked in place without constriction. Many also comment on the stylish, sleek silhouette that pairs well with athletic or casual wear.

While designed with running and training in mind, the versatility and smart aesthetics make APL sneakers suitable for all-day wear.

Nike Overview

Nike was founded in 1964 by Bill Bowerman and Phil Knight as Blue Ribbon Sports, initially importing Japanese running shoes before establishing their own footwear manufacturing in the 1970s.

Nike Founders

Nike popularized innovations like the waffle outsole and air cushioning technology, earning the brand a reputation for performance and style.

Today, Nike is the largest athletic shoe company in the world, producing footwear and apparel for virtually every sport imaginable.

In running specifically, Nike is the undisputed market leader, offering an enormous range of shoes tailored for competition, training, and everyday running at varying price points. The Nike Pegasus, introduced in the 1980s, remains one of their most ubiquitous neutral trainers.

Other pioneering technologies include Shox columns for impact absorption and lightweight Flyknit uppers. As a global brand active in sports science research, Nike employs state-of-the-art product testing to create performance-driven footwear.

Recent releases like the Alphafly NEXT% racing shoe with carbon fiber plates demonstrate Nike’s commitment to pushing boundaries. For runners of all levels, Nike offers both cutting-edge models as well as classic staples like the Air Zoom Pegasus.

With its iconic Swoosh logo and pervasive marketing and sponsorship, Nike has become one of the most recognizable brands worldwide.

Major Differences Between these Brands

Comfort and Fit

Both brands offer a comfortable and responsive fit, but APL shoes tend to feel more luxurious and sock-like due to the TechLoom upper material. However, Nike provides more variety to accommodate different foot shapes and sizes.

Durability and Performance

Top-end shoes from both brands are finely tuned for performance, but APL shoes excel in energy return and responsiveness while Nike offers more all-around durability.


Nike has a wider range of lower cost options, while APL focuses on premium-priced performance shoes.

Design and Style

APL shoes have a distinct athletic aesthetic with bold, mashed-up color combos. Nike has far more lifestyle and retro options tapping into streetwear trends.


Nike has an edge in broad mainstream recognition and appeal. Serious athletes know APL for its innovative performance tech.

Target Market

APL caters to athletes looking for a competitive edge. Nike has mass appeal but does serve elite athletes too.

Performance Comparison

For Nurses

Nike shoes tend to offer better all-day comfort and support for nurses who are on their feet for long shifts. Models like the Nike Air Zoom Pulse provide cushioning and slip resistance.

For Walking

For daily walking and fitness, Nike’s broad selection accommodates walking needs better through supportive technologies like Air Max and React Foam.

For Running

APL’s shoes take the lead for serious runners seeking more responsiveness and energy return to enhance performance and speed.

For Flat Feet

Nike’s wide range provides good options like the Zoom Vomero 5 for flat feet, whereas APL shoes are tailored more for neutral feet.

For Back Pain

The extra cushioning and support from Nike Air Max and Zoom Air models can alleviate some back pain when walking or standing.

For Standing All Day

For extended standing, Nike’s Air Max and React Foam technologies reduce fatigue better than the average APL shoe.

For High Arches

APL shoes work well for high arches since models offer a good balance of cushioning and support.

For Hiking

Nike’s hiking and trail running shoes provide superior grip and durability for rugged hikes compared to APL’s more performance-focused designs.

For Plantar Fasciitis

Nike Zoom Air and Air Max cushioning absorbs impact well to aid plantar fasciitis, while APL has fewer maximum cushioning options.

The Final Verdict

Both APL and Nike make excellent performance shoes, but Nike is hard to beat for range of selection, lifestyle options, and accommodating various foot issues.

However, the focused performance technology from APL gives them an edge for runners and basketball players seeking energy return and responsiveness.

Ultimately, choosing between these two brands comes down to your priorities and needs as an athlete or sneakerhead. Try on shoes from both brands to get a feel for their fit and comfort to determine which resonates most with your feet!

Leave a comment