Brooks Hyperion Tempo VS Hoka Mach 4: What Should I Buy?

Looking for a lightweight, responsive running shoe? The Brooks Hyperion Tempo and Hoka One One Mach 4 are two of the most popular options on the market.

Both shoes offer a cushioned yet firm ride and excel at faster paced training, making them great choices for runners looking to pick up the pace.

This in-depth comparison examines the key features and performance of these popular neutral trainers to help you decide which is the better choice for your needs.

Similarities And Differences Between Brooks Hyperion Tempo And Hoka Mach 4:

SpecsBrooks Hyperion TempoHoka Mach 4
Launched In20202021
SizingMen’s 7-13, Women’s 5-12Men’s 7-13, Women’s 5-12
Weight8.5 oz (M), 7.5 oz (W)7.6 oz (M), 6.6 oz (W)
CushionDNA Flash midsoleProfly midsole
OutsoleDurable rubberDurable rubber
MidsoleDNA FlashProfly
UpperEngineered meshEngineered mesh
Retail Price$150$353

Features Comparison:

The Hyperion and Mach 4 are high-quality shoes with amazing features. So to make things easier we are going to compare some important features between the two to help you decide.


The Brooks Hyperion Tempo uses a durable rubber outsole and DNA Flash midsole foam for a responsive yet firm cushioned ride. The engineered mesh upper provides a flexible and breathable fit.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo

Hoka Mach 4

The Hoka One One Mach 4 also utilizes a durable rubber outsole along with the Profly midsole foam for soft yet energetic cushioning. An engineered mesh upper allows for ventilation and support.


Both the Hyperion Tempo and Mach 4 are built to last thanks to their sturdy rubber outsoles. The outsoles grip surfaces well and are resistant to abrasion.

The mesh uppers are also durable while providing the necessary breathability and flexibility.


The Hyperion Tempo runs true to size for most in a snug midfoot fit with a roomy toe box. The upper conforms closely for a secure feel.

Brooks Hyperion Tempo Top view


The Mach 4 also fits true to size but has a wider fit through the midfoot and toebox. The stretchy upper accommodates wider feet while providing a sock-like fit.


As neutral shoes, both models offer straightforward stability without any pronation-correcting features.

The Hyperion Tempo provides additional midfoot security from the supportive upper while the Mach 4’s broad base feels stable.


Brooks’ springy DNA Flash foam gives the Hyperion Tempo increased energy return for faster-paced runs. The low-profile cushioning delivers a firm, responsive feel.

The Mach 4’s Profly foam has soft properties to dampen impact while maintaining liveliness. The cushioning provides softness underfoot without feeling too mushy.


Both shoes deliver excellent performance at reasonable prices. The Hyperion Tempo costs $150 while the Mach 4 has a higher retail price of $353, which is typical for an older model that is harder to find.

Considering their durable constructions, responsive cushions, and versatile wear, they are great values.

Performance Comparison:

Now we are going to judge the performance of both shoes to see which is better for you.


The Hyperion Tempo’s firm DNA Flash foam doesn’t provide much softness for leisurely walking. The Mach 4’s Profly cushioning absorbs shock better during walking and makes it the preferable choice for this activity.


When picking up speed, the Hyperion Tempo shines. The DNA Flash foam and snug upper work together to provide an energized feel for quicker paces. The Mach 4 is also responsive but feels less stable at faster speeds.

Plantar Fasciitis

The ample cushioning of the Mach 4 better protects against pain from plantar fasciitis when moving. The Hyperion Tempo’s thinner midsole doesn’t supply as much shock absorption, so it may worsen symptoms.

All Day Wear

The Hyperion Tempo’s thin padding isn’t ideal for extended wear. However, the Mach 4 has sufficient cushioning and a roomy fit to keep feet comfortable when standing or walking around all day.

final Verdict

For runners seeking a lightweight trainer for speedwork and race day, the Brooks Hyperion Tempo is the better choice. Its low-profile DNA Flash foam and grippy outsole provide an energized ride perfect for faster training and tempo runs.

For runners looking for an everyday trainer with enhanced comfort, the Hoka One One Mach 4 takes the lead. The Profly foam absorbs shock better and the roomier fit caters to a wider range of feet, making it the more versatile option for logging daily miles.

Both are quality shoes, but cater to different needs. Choose the Hyperion Tempo if you want a responsive, race-ready trainer and the Mach 4 if you prioritize all-around cushioning and comfort. Analyze your preferences and needs to decide which neutral running shoe is the best match.

Leave a comment