Hoka Arahi 7 VS Asics GT-2000 12: What Should I Buy?

The Hoka Arahi 7 and Asics GT-2000 12 are both popular stability running shoes designed for runners who overpronate.

The Arahi 7 is Hoka’s latest update to their supportive shoe line, while the GT-2000 12 is the newest iteration of Asics’ classic stability model.

Read on to see how these shoes stack up across various features and performance metrics to help you decide which one may be the better choice for your needs.

Similarities And Differences Between Asics GT-2000 12 and Hoka Arahi 7:

FeaturesHoka Arahi 7Asics GT-2000 12
Launched In20242023
StabilityModerateModerate
FlexibilityModerateModerate
SizingTrue to sizeRuns small, go up 0.5 size
Weight9.5 oz (M), 8.7 oz (W)10.9 oz (M), 9.1 oz (W)
CushioningModeratePlush
OutsoleZonal rubberAHAR rubber
MidsoleJ-Frame, CMEVA foamFlyteFoam Propel
UpperEngineered meshEngineered mesh
Retail Price$145$140

Features Comparison

MATERIALS

The Arahi 7 uses a zonal rubber outsole to provide durability in high-wear areas. The midsole uses Hoka’s signature CMEVA foam along with a J-Frame technology to provide stability. The upper is an engineered mesh for breathability.

ARAHI 7
ARAHI 7

Asics GT-2000 12
GT 2000 12 TOP VIEW

The GT-2000 12 has an AHAR rubber outsole for durability, a FlyteFoam Propel midsole for responsive cushioning, and an engineered mesh upper. Both shoes use material elements strategically to deliver the right blend of cushioning, support, stability and durability.

DURABILITY

Both shoes are quite durable, with rubber outsoles and quality foam midsoles that maintain their properties over many miles.

The Arahi 7 may have a slight edge with its zonal rubber placing durable rubber in key areas. But overall, both provide excellent durability for hundreds of miles. They are built to go the distance with components that retain their cushioning, stability and support even in the later stages of the shoes’ lifespans.

FIT

The Arahi 7 fits true to size for most runners, with a secure midfoot and roomy toe box. The GT-2000 12 runs small, so sizing up 0.5 size is recommended for the best fit. It also has a snugger fit overall, better for narrow to normal feet.

ARAHI 7 TOP VIEW
ARAHI 7 TOP VIEW

Asics GT-2000 12 TOP VIEW
GT 2000 12

The Arahi 7 will accommodate more foot shapes and volumes, while the GT-2000 12 favors lower-volume feet.

STABILITY

Both shoes provide excellent stability for overpronators through different technologies. The Arahi 7 uses a J-Frame to prevent excessive rolling inwards, while the GT-2000 12 uses a Dynamic DuoMax system to guide the foot. Both guide overpronation well without being too rigid.

The Arahi 7 feels more locked-in and firm, while the GT-2000 12 feels a bit smoother underfoot. But they both deliver ample support mile after mile for overpronators.

CUSHIONING

The GT-2000 12 has a noticeably plushier feel underfoot thanks to its FlyteFoam Propel midsole compared to the firmer ride of the Arahi 7.

Cushion-seekers may prefer the GT-2000 12’s plusher ride, especially at slower paces. But at speed, both offer enough cushion to be comfortable for fast training. The Arahi 7 gives a ground feel while the GT-2000 12 focuses more on softness.

VALUE

These shoes have very similar $140-145 price tags. Given their excellent durability and performance, they both deliver great value at this price point for stability runners.

The GT-2000 12 may have a slight edge for some given its plusher cushioning. But both justify their pricing through durable components, lasting comfort and support, and smooth transitions ideal for daily training miles.

Performance Comparison

FOR WALKING

Both shoes perform well for walking, providing a smooth and comfortable ride. The GT-2000 12 may feel slightly more luxurious for walking due to its softer midsole foam. But the Arahi 7 is supportive and responsive too. Overall, casual walkers would appreciate either option.

FOR RUNNING

As stability running shoes, both models excel at daily training runs. They provide pronation control and cushioning to log mile after mile.

The GT-2000 12 feels a bit softer underfoot, while the Arahi 7 feels more responsive. So runner preferences may vary. But performance is solid in both as stable yet comfortable everyday trainers.

FOR PLANTAR FASCIITIS

With good arch support and ample cushioning, these shoes can aid runners with plantar fasciitis.

The Arahi 7’s firmer ride offers more ground feel, which some may prefer for plantar fasciitis. But the GT-2000 12 is well-cushioned too. Either can relieve PF pain during runs thanks to their combination of support, stability and shock attenuation.

FOR STANDING ALL DAY

The plush GT-2000 12 may have a slight advantage for all-day standing comfort thanks to its FlyteFoam Propel cushioning. But the Arahi 7 offers cushioning and support as well, making it a good option too. Overall, both can aid workers who are on their feet for long hours.

Final Verdict:

In the end, choosing between the Hoka Arahi 7 and the Asics GT-2000 12 will come down to personal preferences. The Arahi 7 offers a firm yet responsive ride with moderate cushioning while The GT-2000 12 prioritizes soft cushioning for a more luxurious feel.


If you want a plush feel underfoot, the GT-2000 12 is likely the better choice. But if you prefer ground feel and responsiveness, go with the Arahi 7.

Lastly, you can’t go wrong with either as a supportive training shoe for overpronators. Consider fit and personal cushioning preferences to decide which is better for your needs.

Leave a comment