Hoka Mach 4 VS Bondi 7: What Should I Buy?

The Hoka One One Mach 4 and Bondi 7 are both cushioned running shoes from Hoka, but they have some key differences that may make one better suited for your needs than the other.

This in-depth comparison looks at the specs, features, and performance of the Mach 4 vs the Bondi 7 to help you decide which Hoka shoe is right for you.

Similarities And Differences Between Hoka Mach 4 And Bondi 7:

FeatureHoka Mach 4Hoka Bondi 7
Launched In20212020
SizingMen’s 7-13, Women’s 5.5-11Men’s 7-13, Women’s 5.5-11
Weight8.8 oz (M), 7.8 oz (W)10.3 oz (M), 9.3 oz (W)
MidsoleCMEVA foamCMEVA foam

Features Comparison:


The Mach 4 uses a breathable mesh upper with lightweight synthetic overlays. The midsole is made of soft CMEVA foam to provide responsive cushioning. The rubber outsole has grooves in the forefoot to allow the shoe to flex.

Hoka Mach 4

Bondi 7

The Bondi 7 also utilizes a breathable mesh upper with synthetic overlays. It shares the same CMEVA foam midsole as the Mach 4, providing soft cushioning. The rubber outsole has deeper flex grooves for flexibility.


The Mach 4 has decent durability thanks to its rubber outsole which protects against wear and tear. The upper is resistant to abrasion but not as durable as the Bondi 7.

The Bondi 7 features a durable rubber outsole that can handle hundreds of miles of use. The upper is also highly resistant to abrasion for increased longevity. Between the two, the Bondi 7 is built to last longer.


The Mach 4 runs true to size for most runners, with a roomy toe box and snug midfoot wrap. The upper is flexible and adapts well to foot swelling on longer runs. It accommodates a variety of foot shapes.


Bondi 7 Top View

The Bondi 7 has a more narrow, tapered fit. It can feel tight for those with wider feet. The toe box is more rounded than the Mach 4. Overall, the Mach 4 will fit more foot shapes and widths comfortably.


As neutral shoes, both the Mach 4 and Bondi 7 focus on cushioning over stability. The Mach 4 has a lower stack height which provides a more ground feel, keeping runners stable.

The Bondi 7 has a high stack height which softens impact but reduces inherent stability. However, it still provides adequate midfoot support for neutral runners. Between the two, the Mach 4 will be the more stable option.


The Mach 4 offers plush cushioning from its high-rebound CMEVA midsole. Though well-cushioned, it has more ground contact than the Bondi 7 for better stability.

The Bondi 7 maximizes cushioning with an ultra-thick CMEVA midsole, providing extremely soft impact absorption from heel to toe. However, it sacrifices some stability in favor of its supremely plush ride. For maximum softness, the Bondi 7 wins.


The Mach 4 costs $353, delivering responsive cushioning in a lightweight package ideal for daily training. The price reflects its versatility as an affordable workhorse.

The Bondi 7 is priced at $170, providing next-level softness ideal for recovery days and long mileage. The extra cost goes towards the premium cushioning and increased durability. It’s a worthwhile splurge for some.

Performance Comparisons:


For walking, the Mach 4 is highly responsive while providing cushioned comfort on each step. Its moderate flexibility allows a smooth heel-to-toe transition.

The Bondi 7 has a plush, pillowy feel that absorbs shock with each step. The rockered sole promotes an easy walking gait, but the stiff platform reduces natural flexibility. The Mach 4 wins for a more comfortable walking shoe.


When running, the Mach 4 offers a balance of responsiveness and cushioning to protect against impact. The rockered geometry encourages an efficient heel-to-toe transition.

The Bondi 7 has superior shock absorption, making it ideal for recovery days or marathon training. The excessive cushioning provides a soft landing with each stride. However, the high stack height can feel unstable at faster paces. For most runners, the Mach 4 is the better pick.


The Mach 4’s moderate cushioning softens impact to reduce strain on the plantar fascia. The rockered sole also encourages smooth heel-to-toe transitions, minimizing the risk of flare-ups.

The Bondi 7’s plush cushioning absorbs more shock for runners with plantar fasciitis. However, the shoe is quite heavy which could worsen pain over time: the Mach 4 balances cushioning and lightweight performance to better suit sensitive feet.


The Mach 4 has ample cushioning and a responsive platform to maintain comfort during long periods of standing. The upper also accommodates swelling feet. However, the midsole may pack out over time.

The Bondi 7’s supremely plush midsole maintains cushioning even after hours of standing. The snug upper offers arch support to fight fatigue. Overall, the Bondi 7 is better suited for all-day use.


For most runners, the Hoka Mach 4 is the better choice between the two. It offers a responsive and well-cushioned ride in a lightweight package ideal for training.

The Mach 4 fits more foot shapes comfortably and provides better stability for faster paces. The affordable price also makes it a great value for daily miles.

However, the Bondi 7 shines for those wanting maximum cushioning. The soft, pillowy ride makes it perfect for recovery days or marathon training when you want to go easy on your legs. The durable materials also allow it to hold up to high mileage. So if you prioritize plush softness over everything, the Bondi 7 delivers.

Overall, the versatile Mach 4 will work better for most. But runners who crave soft cushioning may find the Bondi 7 worth the splurge. Consider your preferences and needs to decide which of these Hoka shoes is your winner.

Leave a comment