Hoka Rincon 2 VS Clifton 7: What Should I Buy?

When it comes to premium running shoes, Hoka One One is a brand that consistently delivers. With a wide range of shoe models to choose from, runners can find a Hoka shoe well-suited for their needs.

Two of Hoka One One’s most popular neutral cushioned trainers are the Rincon 2 and the Clifton 7. Both shoes provide responsive cushioning and lightweight comfort, but they differ in their overall feel and ideal use cases.

This in-depth comparison of the key features and real-world performance of the Hoka Rincon 2 versus the Clifton 7 will help you decide which model is the better choice for you.

Similarities And Differences Between Hoka Rincon 2 and Clifton 7:

FeatureHoka Rincon 2Hoka Clifton 7
Launched In2020 2020
StabilityNeutralNeutral
FlexibilityModerateModerate
SizingMen’s 7-13, Women’s 5-11Men’s 7-13, Women’s 5-11
Weight7.2 oz (men’s), 6.2 oz (women’s)8.8 oz (men’s), 7.7 oz (women’s)
CushioningModerateMaximum
OutsoleDurable rubberDurable rubber
MidsolePROFLYTM dual-densityPROFLYTM dual-density
UpperEngineered meshEngineered mesh
Retail Price$131$170

Feature Comparison

Materials

The Rincon 2 uses a compression-molded EVA midsole foam which provides a firm, responsive feel underfoot. The engineered mesh upper is highly breathable. The meta-rocker outsole ensures a smooth transition from heel to toe.

RINCON 2
RINCON 2

Hoka Clifton 7
CLIFTON 7

The Clifton 7 has a softer EVA midsole foam for maximum cushioning and shock absorption. It shares the breathable mesh upper and meta-rocker outsole design of the Rincon 2.

Durability

The Rincon 2 holds up well for around 300 miles for the average runner. The firmer foam may lose some responsiveness over time. The outsole rubber also shows reasonable durability for high-mileage training.

The Clifton 7 generally lasts slightly longer, with some runners getting over 400 miles out of a pair. The softer foam retains cushioning for more miles before breaking down. The outsole rubber remains durable even at higher mileage.

Fit

The Rincon 2 runs true to size for most runners. It has a comfortable, sock-like fit in the upper. The moderate heel counter provides a secure lockdown. Some may find the toe box to be on the narrower side.

RINCON 2 TOP VIEW
RINCON 2 TOP VIEW

Clifton 7 Top View
CLIFTON 7 TOP VIEW

The Clifton 7 has a roomier forefoot and toe box while still providing a snug heel and midfoot fit. It accommodates wider feet better than the Rincon 2. The padded tongue and collar enhance comfort.

Stability

The Rincon 2 is a neutral shoe with little inherent stability. The firm midsole gives it a stable, balanced feel at moderate speeds. At faster paces, some runners notice it feeling wobbly laterally.

The Clifton 7 ‘s softer foam compresses more, reducing stability slightly. The early-stage meta-rocker helps guide the foot through the gait cycle. Overall, both shoes are best for neutral runners not needing correction for overpronation.

Cushioning

The Rincon 2 has a moderate cushioning level that provides responsive shock absorption without excessive softness. The compression-molded midsole foam delivers an energetic rebound.

The Clifton 7 maximizes cushioning with its soft, thick midsole foam. This gives it a plush, pillowy feel underfoot. The cushioning absorbs impact comfortably over long distances.

Value

The Rincon 2 delivers impressive responsiveness and lightweight comfort at a more affordable $131 price point. The Clifton 7 costs slightly more at $170 but offers superior cushioning and comfort for high mileage training and all-day wear.

Choose the Rincon 2 to save money without sacrificing performance and choose the Clifton 7 if maximum cushioning is your top priority.

Performance Comparison

For Walking

The Rincon 2s responsive sole feels quite firm when walking slowly. The low flexibility in the forefoot reduces natural foot bending. The Clifton 7 has better walking comfort with its softer cushioning. Its smoother heel-to-toe transition caters better to casual walking gaits.

For Running

As a versatile neutral trainer, the Rincon 2 balances cushioning, flexibility, and snappy responsiveness over middle distances to marathon races.

The Clifton 7 has plusher cushioning to soften hard impacts but loses some snappy speed over faster efforts. It shines for high mileage training and long-distance comfort.

For Plantar Fasciitis

The Rincon 2’s lower profile and firmer cushioning give adequate arch support for mild plantar fasciitis. However, runners needing more enhanced support may find the Clifton 7 better for reducing heel and arch pain. Its deep cushioning and smooth transition relieve pressure on the plantar fascia.

For Standing All Day

The Rincon 2 offers less all-day comfort than the Clifton 7 if you’ll be on your feet for extended periods. The Clifton 7‘s plush cushioning absorbs shock and reduces fatigue better with its softer foam and flexible transition. For prolonged standing, the Clifton 7 is the clear winner.

Final Verdict

The Hoka Rincon 2 and Clifton 7 share similarities like breathable mesh uppers and meta-rocker outsoles. The key difference lies in the cushioning. With its responsive, firmer ride, the Rincon 2 suits faster running and races for neutral runners.


The maximally cushioned Clifton 7 offers superior comfort for long, easy mileage days. It also works better for walking, plantar fasciitis, and all-day use.

Choose the Rincon 2 if you want a lightweight, low-profile trainer/racer. Go with the Clifton 7 for softness and shock absorption when comfort is your priority. Either way, you can’t go wrong with these two excellent neutral shoes from Hoka!

Leave a comment