Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 40 VS Hoka Rincon 3: What Should I Buy?

If you’re a runner looking for a versatile daily trainer that can handle a variety of runs, the Nike Pegasus and Hoka Rincon are two of the most popular options on the market.

The Nike Pegasus 40 and Hoka Rincon 3 are neutral, cushioned shoes suitable for training and racing. But with differences in weight, cushioning, price and more, it can be tough to decide which is the better choice for you.

This in-depth comparison of the key features, performance and value of the Nike Pegasus 40 versus the Hoka Rincon 3 will help you determine the right shoe for your needs.

Read on for a breakdown of sizing, weight, construction, cushioning, and real-world performance in areas like running, walking, and standing all day. By the end, you’ll know whether the Pegasus or Rincon is the better daily trainer for you.

Similarities And Differences Between Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 40 And Hoka Rincon 3

SpecNike Pegasus 40Hoka Rincon 3
Launch Date20232021
SizingMen’s 7-13, Women’s 5-12Men’s 7-13, Women’s 5-12
Weight9.2 oz (men’s)6.5 oz (men’s)
CushionNike React foamProfly foam
OutsoleDurable rubber with flex groovesDurable rubber with flex grooves
MidsoleNike React foamProfly foam
UpperEngineered meshEngineered mesh
Retail Price$130$125

Features Comparison


The Nike Pegasus 40 uses a durable rubber outsole with flex grooves for flexibility, a Nike React foam midsole to absorb impact, and an engineered mesh upper for breathability and support.

Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 40

rincon 3

The Hoka Rincon 3 also uses a durable rubber outsole and engineered mesh upper but has a Profly foam midsole. Both shoes use quality materials, but the Rincon’s Profly foam is lighter.


Testers found the Pegasus to be highly durable, lasting over 500 miles for many runners. The Rincon 3 is also known for its durability, with the Profly foam retaining its bounce over many miles. Both shoes have sturdy outsoles and uppers as well. Overall, the Pegasus and Rincon are evenly matched in durability.


The Pegasus 40 runs true to size for most in a medium width. The redesigned engineered mesh upper provides a comfortable, secure fit.

Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 40 TOP VIEW

rincon 3 top view

The Rincon 3 also fits true to size for most runners. It has a seamless, sock-like upper that provides a sleek, comfortable fit. The Pegasus offers a slightly more tailored and supportive fit while the Rincon offers a more foot-hugging fit.


As neutral shoes, neither the Nike Pegasus 40 nor the Hoka Rincon 3 offer features for stability or overpronation. Both have moderate flexibility to allow the foot to move naturally.

The Pegasus provides a bit more structure while the Rincon has more freedom of movement. For neutral runners, both offer an appropriate amount of stability.


The Pegasus uses Nike’s soft, responsive React foam for cushioning while the Rincon utilizes the lightweight, soft Profly foam. Testers found both foams to provide good shock absorption mile after mile.

The Pegasus offers a thicker layer of foam for more softness underfoot, while the Rincon’s foam creates a firmer yet still cushioned ride.


At a $130 price point, the Pegasus 40 offers strong value as a durable daily trainer from a top brand. Meanwhile, the Rincon 3 has a lower $125 price tag.

However, testers felt the innovative Profly foam and overall performance of the shoe made it worth the slightly lower cost. Overall, both models deliver on value and are competitively priced.

Performance Comparison


The Nike Pegasus provides plush cushioning, making walking comfortable for long distances or all-day wear. The React foam and engineered upper offer softness without too much instability.

Meanwhile, the Hoka Rincon is incredibly lightweight at just 6.5 oz making it nimble for walking. The Profly foam also provides good impact protection. Overall, the Pegasus is likely the better choice for dedicated walking in terms of all day comfort.


Testers found both models to perform well for varied running needs, from tempo runs to long miles. The Pegasus 40 provides a smooth, stable ride with great shock absorption mile after mile thanks to the React foam.

The Rincon 3 is very responsive and fast thanks to the energetic Profly foam, while still giving cushion. Either shoe is a great pick for regular training and racing for neutral runners.


The Nike Pegasus provides ample cushioning and good arch support, making it a solid choice for runners with plantar fasciitis. The plush React foam softens impact that can irritate the plantar fascia.

The Rincon is quite firm and thin underfoot so it may not be sufficient for severe plantar fasciitis. However, it still delivers some cushioning for mild cases. Overall, the Pegasus is likely the better choice for plantar fasciitis.


The Pegasus 40’s React foam and comfortable upper provide cushioning and support during prolonged standing and walking. The engineered mesh also remains breathable during long wear.

The Rincon 3, while cushioned, is quite lightweight which may feel less supportive for all day standing. Its thin profile has less shock absorption over many hours. For extended standing, the Pegasus is likely the better option.

Final Verdict

For most runners, the Nike Pegasus 40 and the Hoka Rincon 3 are both excellent options as daily trainers with cushioning and versatility. The Pegasus has a slight edge for the runner who prioritizes comfort, support, and durability with its structured React foam and secure upper. It excels at long miles and all-day wear.

Meanwhile, the Rincon is ideal for the runner seeking a responsive, natural ride in a lightweight package. Its energetic Profly foam provides a smooth, efficient ride. If speed and agility are your main concerns, the Rincon has the advantage.

Consider your usage – whether you want a workhorse trainer or a fast, fun feel – along with fit and budget to choose the better daily trainer for you between two excellent neutral shoes: the Nike Pegasus 40 and Hoka Rincon 3.

Leave a comment