Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 VS Hoka Rincon 3: What Should I Buy?

The Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 and Hoka Rincon 3 are both neutral shoes built for speed, catering to a wide range of runners seeking a lightweight yet cushioned ride.

The Endorphin Speed 3 is the third iteration of Saucony’s popular Speed series, while the Rincon 3 is the latest update to Hoka’s beloved Rincon line. Both shoes weigh under 8 ounces and feature responsive midsoles to keep you moving fast.

However, some key differences may make one shoe a better choice than the other depending on your foot type, running style, and preferences. Read on for a detailed comparison of these two versatile, fan-favorite trainers.

Similarities And Differences Between Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 and Hoka Rincon 3:

SpecsSaucony Endorphin Speed 3Hoka Rincon 3
Launched In20222021
StabilityNeutralNeutral
FlexibilityModerateModerate
SizingMen’s 7-13, Women’s 5-12Men’s 7-13, Women’s 5-11
Weight7.9 oz (men’s 9)7.2 oz (men’s 9)
CushioningPWRRUN PBProFly
OutsolePWRRUN PBRubber
MidsolePWRRUN PBProFly
UpperEngineered meshEngineered mesh
Retail Price$170$125

Features Comparison:

Materials:

The Endorphin Speed 3 uses a full-length PWRRUN PB midsole, made from Saucony’s bouncy and responsive foam blend. The engineered mesh upper provides a secure foot lockdown. The durable PWRRUN PB rubber outsole is designed for traction and flexibility.

Saucony Endorphin Speed 3
ENDORPHIN SPEED 3

rincon 3
RINCON 3

The Rincon 3 has a ProFly midsole made from Hoka’s soft, resilient foam. The breathable engineered mesh upper offers a comfortable fit. The high-abrasion rubber outsole provides durability and grip.

Durability:

The Endorphin Speed 3 holds up well for around 300-500 miles. The durable PWRRUN PB foam maintains its bounce and the outsole rubber resists wear and tear. The upper mesh is prone to some tearing with heavy use.

The Rincon 3 is a fairly durable shoe, lasting for 300-400 miles typically. The ProFly midsole retains cushioning and the rubber outsole withstands abrasion. The upper mesh shows minimal signs of wear over time.

Fit:

The Endorphin Speed 3 runs small and has a tighter midfoot fit. Going up 1/2 size provides a more comfortable experience. The sculpted heel counter and integrated tongue help lock the foot in place. The shoe accommodates narrow to medium foot widths.

Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 TOP VIEW
ENDORPHIN SPEED 3 TOP VIEW

rincon 3 top view
RINCON 3 TOP VIEW

The Rincon 3 runs true to size for most. The engineered mesh upper adapts to a variety of foot shapes. The heel counter and padded tongue securely lock in the foot. The shoe fits narrow, medium, and slightly wide feet well.

Stability:

As neutral shoes, both the Endorphin Speed 3 and Rincon 3 offer inherent stability for most runners. The Endorphin Speed’s firmer midsole and structured upper provide a bit more support and guidance for moderate overpronators. The Rincon 3’s softer foam has less rigidity but remains stable.

Cushioning:

The PWRRUN PB foam in the Endorphin Speed 3 offers an excellent balance of soft, bouncy cushioning with a responsive, propulsive toe-off. The low-profile design enhances the ground feel while still absorbing impact.

The Rincon 3’s plush ProFly foam midsole provides more overall cushioning, especially in the heel. The soft foam absorbs shock smoothly but has less pop than the Endorphin Speed 3.

Value:

At $170, the Endorphin Speed 3 costs more than the Rincon 3, which retails at $125. For serious runners training for races and seeking a highly responsive, lightweight performance trainer, the Endorphin Speed 3 is worth the investment. More budget-minded runners who prioritize cushioning will appreciate the softer Rincon 3.

Performance Comparison:

For Walking:

The well-cushioned Rincon 3 is the better choice for walking. Its soft, flexible foam midsole ensures plush comfort mile after mile. The Endorphin Speed 3 is too lightweight and responsive, lacking the right components for easy walking.

For Running:

For faster-paced running, the Endorphin Speed 3 excels with its snappy, propulsive ride. The energetic foam and breathable upper keep you moving fast with ease. The Rincon 3 provides the right balance of comfort and support for slower jogs and recovery runs.

For Plantar Fasciitis:

The Rincon 3 works well for runners with plantar fasciitis who need ample cushioning. The soft ProFly foam absorbs shock gently without being too mushy. The Endorphin Speed 3 has less overall cushioning but its responsive nature offers some protection.

For Standing All Day:

Neither shoe is ideal for all-day standing. The Rincon 3 has more cushioning which helps a bit, but lacks the support and stability needed for prolonged standing. Similarly, the low-profile Endorphin Speed 3 doesn’t provide enough cushioning relief.

Final Verdict:

For runners seeking a lightweight, responsive trainer for faster-paced runs, the Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 takes the lead with its energetic foam, smooth transitions, and breathable upper. The snappy ride is ideal for tempo runs, intervals, and race day.


Runners focused on cushioning comfort will love the plush Hoka Rincon 3. It provides a smooth, soft ride that excels at slower paces and offers relief for sore feet. The Rincon 3 is also a bit more budget-friendly.

So choose the Endorphin Speed 3 if you want an agile, propulsive trainer and the Rincon 3 if you prioritize cushioning comfort above all else. Either way, you’ll be getting a high-quality, versatile running shoe built for speed.

Leave a comment