If you’re a runner searching for a lightweight, versatile daily trainer, the Saucony Kinvara 14 and Hoka One One Rincon 3 are two of the hottest shoes on the market right now.
However, some key differences between these trainers are worth examining before deciding which is right for you. This in-depth comparison of the Kinvara 14 and Rincon 3 breaks down the specs, features, and performance of each shoe.
We’ll compare the upper materials, durability, fit, stability, cushioning, and value to help you determine the better option for your running needs. Read on to find out which trainer comes out on top!
Similarities And Differences Between Saucony Kinvara 14 and Hoka Rincon 3:
| Specs | Saucony Kinvara 14 | Hoka Rincon 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2023 | 2021 |
| Stability | Neutral | Neutral |
| Flexibility | High | High |
| Sizing | Men’s 7-13, Women’s 5-12 | Men’s 7-13, Women’s 5-12 |
| Weight | 7 oz (men’s) | 6.5 oz (men’s) |
| Cushion | Moderate | Moderate |
| Outsole | PWRRUN+ rubber | Durable rubber |
| Midsole | PWRRUN | PROFLY |
| Upper | Engineered mesh | Engineered mesh |
| Retail Price | $120 | $125 |
Features Comparison:
MATERIALS:
The Saucony Kinvara 14 uses a breathable engineered mesh for the upper to provide a flexible, comfortable fit. The midsole is made of PWRRUN foam, which is lightweight and responsive. The outsole uses PWRRUN+ rubber for durability and grip.
The Hoka Rincon 3 also utilizes an engineered mesh upper for ventilation and flexibility. Its PROFLY midsole foam is soft and resilient while remaining lively. The outsole is high-abrasion rubber that helps to increase durability.
DURABILITY:
The PWRRUN+ rubber outsole of the Kinvara 14 provides improved durability over previous versions, though some testers feel it could still be Sturdier.
The Rincon 3’s full-coverage rubber outsole boosts durability significantly over past Rincon models. Overall, the Rincon 3 has an edge when it comes to lasting mileage.
FIT:
The Kinvara 14 fits true to size for most runners, with a comfortable, secure midfoot wrap and roomy toe box.
The Rincon 3 also fits true to size for many, with a soft, comfortable upper that allows for some stretch around the midfoot.
Both shoes should accommodate medium to wide foot shapes. The Rincon 3 may feel slightly more spacious due to its higher midsole stack.
STABILITY:
As neutral shoes, neither model offers much in the way of stability features. The Kinvara 14 provides a stable, smooth ride but is best for neutral runners.
The Rincon 3 is also best suited to neutral runners, though testers note it feels slightly less stable at slower paces. At faster speeds, the Rincon feels secure.
CUSHIONING:
The Kinvara 14 offers moderate cushioning that is flexible and responsive. The PROFLY midsole of the Rincon 3 provides soft, resilient cushioning with a bouncy feel.
For runners who want the maximum amount of softness underfoot, the Rincon 3 has a slight advantage. However, some may prefer the firmer, more responsive Kinvara cushioning.
VALUE:
With the same $120 And $125 retail price, both shoes offer good value for performance trainers. The Rincon 3 may provide better value for runners looking for maximum mileage, while the Kinvara 14 is a good value for those wanting a lightweight, nimble feel. Both deliver quality at moderate prices.
Performance Comparison:
FOR WALKING:
The flexible Kinvara 14 provides natural walking motion and decent cushioning for short walks. The thick PROFLY foam of the Rincon 3 offers plush cushioning that excels at making long walks comfortable without losing responsiveness. For all-day wear, the Rincon 3 is better for walking.
FOR RUNNING:
As versatile daily trainers, both shoes perform well for runs of any distance. The Kinvara 14 offers a smooth, stable ride at varied paces and excels at faster speeds.
The Rincon 3 provides soft cushioning for easy miles but can pick up the pace nicely. For sprints and races, the Kinvara 14 has the edge.
FOR PLANTAR FASCIITIS:
With ample forefoot flex, the Kinvara 14 allows natural foot movement to reduce strain on the plantar fascia. The Rincon 3’s plush cushioning absorbs more shock for less pressure on the feet, though some testers find it too unstructured. For plantar fasciitis, the Rincon 3 may be slightly better.
FOR STANDING ALL DAY:
The Kinvara 14’s firm cushioning begins to feel flat for extended standing compared to the Rincon 3’s thicker midsole. The Rincon better maintains cushioning and comfort when on your feet all day. For jobs that require a lot of standing, the Rincon 3 performs better.
Final Verdict:
For runners seeking a lightweight, flexible, zippy trainer, the Saucony Kinvara 14 is an excellent choice. It truly shines for faster training and races from 5Ks up to half marathons. With a breathable upper and smooth ride, it works well for neutral runners who want a low-drop shoe with a road feel.
Runners looking for maximum cushioning and comfort in a durable package will love the Hoka Rincon 3. Its energetic midsole provides a plush feel ideal for long miles, recovery runs, and walking. The Rincon is also a good choice for runners who need extra shock absorption for foot issues.
Deciding between these two great shoes ultimately depends on your priorities – lightweight speed vs. cushioned comfort. Try them on back-to-back to see which feels best suited to your needs and running style before deciding if the Kinvara 14 or Rincon 3 will become your new go-to trainer!