The Asics Gel Nimbus series has been a staple for runners looking for a well-cushioned, comfortable daily trainer. The Nimbus 23 and 24 offer neutral cushioning and a smooth ride for easy miles.
But with each new iteration of the Nimbus, Asics makes updates to improve upon the previous model. So how do the Nimbus 23 and 24 compare? Read on to see how these two popular running shoes stack up.
Similarities And Differences Between Nimbus 23 And Nimbus 24:
| Feature | Gel Nimbus 23 | Gel Nimbus 24 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2021 | 2022 |
| Stability | Neutral | Neutral |
| Flexibility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Sizing | True to size | Runs small, consider sizing up 0.5 |
| Weight | 10.9 oz (men’s), 9.2 oz (women’s) | 10.9 oz (men’s), 9.2 oz (women’s) |
| Cushioning | FlyteFoam midsole | FlyteFoam Blast+ midsole |
| Outsole | AHAR rubber | AHAR+ rubber |
| Midsole | FlyteFoam | FlyteFoam Blast+ |
| Upper | Mesh upper | Engineered mesh upper |
| Retail Price | $104 | $90 |
Features Comparison:
Material:
The Nimbus 23 utilizes ASICS’ FlyteFoam technology in the midsole, which provides responsive cushioning from heel to toe. This lightweight foam delivers a plush, stable ride.
In the outsole, the durable AHAR rubber gives excellent traction on varied surfaces while resisting abrasion mile after mile. The breathable mesh upper wraps the foot in comfort.
The Nimbus 24 features an updated FlyteFoam Blast+ midsole foam that gives even softer cushioning underfoot without adding weight. The outsole uses an AHAR+ rubber for improved durability and grip on roads and trails. The engineered mesh upper improves upon the 23’s with more structure and ventilation for a secure, breathable fit.
Durability:
Runners can rely on the Nimbus 23 to go the distance, with many getting 300-500 miles out of this durable trainer before signs of midsole breakdown. The resilient FlyteFoam midsole maintains its energetic bounce mile after mile, while the thick AHAR rubber outsole grips surfaces without excessive wear.
By comparison, the Nimbus 24 has proven less durable, with some runners seeing the FlyteFoam Blast+ midsole flatten permanently after just 200 miles. The outsole also shows wear sooner than the 23’s.
The engineered mesh upper is less structured than the 23’s, leading to the sooner breakdown of the materials. For runners wanting a shoe to last, the Nimbus 23 is the clear winner.
Fit:
The Nimbus 23 fits true to size for most runners, catering to a variety of foot shapes. It offers a roomy toe box to allow natural toe splay while running, preventing irritation or black toenails.
The midfoot has a secure wrap that keeps the foot stable over the platform without squeezing tight or irritating. The heel counter locks in the rear foot without abrasion.
Overall, the 23 accommodates various foot volumes while ensuring a comfortable, irritation-free fit. The Nimbus 24 runs smaller than usual, so sizing up half a size is recommended for the best fit.
The engineered mesh upper fits snugger through the midfoot than the 23 but has a similarly roomy toe box. However, those with wider feet may still prefer sizing up half a size in the 24 for proper forefoot comfort.
Stability:
Although designed as neutral shoes, both the Nimbus 23 and 24 provide some arch support for mild overpronators. However, neither model has medial posts or dual-density midsole foams to prevent excessive rolling in of the foot, which dedicated stability shoes feature.
So severe overpronators would need to look elsewhere for optimal motion control. The Nimbus models offer just enough arch support and midsole reinforcement under the arch for mild pronation, guiding the foot gently through the gait cycle.
But these daily trainers prioritize cushioning over enhanced stability, providing only the basics for arch support. Runners needing substantial stability should check out ASICS’ GT line instead for optimal overpronation correction.
Cushioning:
The Nimbus series is renowned for its ultra-plush cushioning that provides responsive impact absorption mile after mile. The Nimbus 23 utilizes ASICS’ FlyteFoam technology in the midsole to deliver continuous, pillowy softness underfoot without breaking down over time.
This responsive foam absorbs shock and returns energy to the runner for a smooth, comfortable ride. The Nimbus 24 takes the cushioning even further with the next-generation FlyteFoam Blast+ midsole. This formulation feels softer and bouncier than the 23’s, providing a plush sensation underfoot.
However, some runners find it too soft, losing responsiveness and structure later in runs. Both shoes deliver ample cushioning for easy miles, but the 23 balances softness with stability while the 24 prioritizes ultra-plush softness.
Value:
With a retail price of $104, the durable Nimbus 23 was considered a solid value for a cushioned daily trainer that could go the distance. Comparatively, the Nimbus 24 costs only $90 but has proven less durable and stable than the 23.
The updates to the 24’s midsole foam and upper don’t seem to justify the $14 drop in price, especially given user reports of the shoe breaking down after just 200 miles.
For runners wanting more miles for their money, the Nimbus 23 delivers, with some seeing 500+ miles out of their pair. Overall, the 23 provides better value, combining durability, cushioning, and stability at an affordable price point.
Performance Comparision:
For Walking:
The Nimbus 23 and 24 both perform well for walking, providing cushioning and support during long walks. The roomy toe box allows a natural stride. The plush midsole cushions each step, though some may find the 24 too soft. The traction rubber outsole also grips surfaces well during walking.
For Running:
As daily trainers, both shoes provide responsive cushioning for easy and moderate-pace runs. The Nimbus 23 offers a stable platform for smooth miles, while the 24’s softer foam feels more propulsive but less stable. The durable outsole of the 23 makes it better for varied surfaces, while the 24 works best on the road.
For Plantar Fasciitis:
The ample midsole cushioning in both shoes helps provide relief from plantar fasciitis pain. The spongy FlyteFoam conforms to the foot and absorbs shock that can aggravate the plantar fascia. The 23 may be better for longer distances, as the 24’s soft foam loses some support over many miles. Those with wider feet may also prefer the roomier 23.
For Standing All Day:
Runners and workers alike praise the Nimbus line for all-day wear. The bouncy midsole provides comfort for hours on your feet, though some find the 24’s foam compresses permanently after extended wear. Both have decent arch support to reduce foot fatigue. The Nimbus 23’s structure and stability give it an edge for extended standing and walking.
Final Verdict:
When it comes to choosing between the Asics Gel Nimbus 23 and the updated Asics Gel Nimbus 24, the Nimbus 23 is the clear winner for most runners.
Though the Nimbus 24 has a softer midsole and more breathable upper, it sacrifices the durability, stability and true-to-size fit of the 23. The Nimbus 23 offers long-lasting cushioning and support in a versatile package that fits a wide range of foot shapes and running needs.
From walking to marathon training, its responsive FlyteFoam midsole, stable AHAR rubber outsole and structured mesh upper allow it to go the distance in comfort.
Meanwhile, the Nimbus 24 breakdown quicker and lacks the stability necessary for overpronators. Factor in the more affordable $104 price tag, and the Nimbus 23 provides better value and performance for daily miles of any distance. Unless you prize plush softness over all else, the Nimbus 23 is the way to go.