The Hoka Clifton 9 and the Hoka Mach 5 are two of the top cushioned trainers from Hoka One One, but they differ in their features and ideal uses.
This comprehensive comparison covers all the key specs and performance factors to help you determine which Hoka shoe is the better choice for you.
Similarities And Differences Between Hoka Clifton 9 and Mach 5:
| Feature | Hoka Clifton 9 | Hoka Mach 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2023 | 2022 |
| Stability | Very stable | Good |
| Flexibility | Flexible | Good |
| Sizing | Narrow toe box | True to size |
| Weight | 8.7 oz | 7.7 oz |
| Cushioning | Highly cushioned | ProFly+ cushioning |
| Outsole | Rubber | EVA foam |
| Midsole | CMEVA | ProFly+ |
| Upper | Engineered knit mesh | Engineered mesh |
| Retail Price | $145 | $140 |
Features Comparison:
In this section, we will see who is better between Clifton 9 and Mach 5 when we compare the features of both models.
Materials
The Clifton 9 uses a rubber outsole, a CMEVA midsole, and an engineered knit mesh upper. The Mach 5 has an EVA foam outsole, a ProFly+ midsole, and an engineered mesh upper.
Both shoes utilize lightweight, breathable mesh uppers, but the Clifton 9 incorporates knit material for a softer feel.
Durability
The Clifton 9 is known for its durable cushioning and outsole that can go the distance, while the Mach 5 has been reported to show early signs of wear and breakdown. The Mach 5’s EVA foam outsole is less durable than the Clifton’s rubber.
Fit
The Clifton 9 runs narrow, especially in the toe box area. The Mach 5 has a true-to-size fit for most.
Runners with wider feet may prefer the accommodating fit of the Mach 5 over Clifton’s snugger fit.
Stability
With its firm CMEVA midsole and guidance line technology, the Clifton 9 provides excellent stability for overpronators. The Mach 5 has good overall stability but lacks the pronation-control features of the Clifton 9.
Cushioning
The Clifton 9 wins when it comes to plush cushioning with its high-volume compressed midsole. The Mach 5 has decent cushioning from its ProFly+ foam but doesn’t quite match the softness and shock absorption of the Clifton 9.
Value for Money
The Clifton 9 has a retail price of $145, while the Mach 5 costs $140. Both shoes provide good value considering their advanced technologies, materials, and performance features.
The Clifton 9 justifies its slightly higher price tag with its abundant cushioning and excellent durability. The Mach 5 delivers impressive responsiveness and a secure fit at a more budget-friendly cost.
Runners who prioritize plush cushioning and support may find the Clifton 9 worth the extra $5 investment, while budget seekers will be very happy with the performance they get from the Mach 5 for $140. In terms of value for your money, it’s a close race between these two models depending on your priorities.
Performance Comparison:
Here we will see how both shoes deliver in performance. This will help you make an informed decision.
For Walking
The Clifton 9’s responsive cushioning absorbs impact nicely for walking, while the Mach 5’s lower profile gives it a natural walking feel. Either shoe provides the comfort and support needed for long walks. The Mach 5 is more lightweight for easy mobility.
For Running
With its lively ProFly+ foam, the Mach 5 excels at fast-paced training, tempo runs, and uptempo workouts. The Clifton 9 is better suited for easy miles and recovery runs thanks to its soft cushioning.
For Plantar Fasciitis
The Clifton 9’s plush cushioning helps reduce pressure on the plantar fascia, making it a good choice for runners with PF. The Mach 5 has less cushioning, so runners with PF may prefer the added comfort of the Clifton 9.
For Standing All Day
The Clifton 9 provides exceptional cushioning and support which helps reduce fatigue from standing all day. The Mach 5 lacks the plush cushioning of the Clifton 9, but its lightweight feel and decent cushioning can handle lengthy standing when comfort is needed.
Final Verdict:
For runners seeking a well-cushioned stability shoe for daily miles and recovery runs, the Hoka Clifton 9 is the winner. Overpronators and runners with foot issues like plantar fasciitis will benefit most from the Clifton 9.
However, the Hoka Mach 5 takes the prize for speedwork, tempo runs, and runners wanting lightweight performance without excessive stability features. Budget seekers get great value from the Mach 5, but the Clifton 9 is worth the investment for those who prioritize premium cushioning, support, and durability.
Carefully examine your running needs and preferences to decide if the Clifton’s cushy stability or the Mach’s responsive pep is the ideal match. Both Hoka models deliver quality comfort and performance.