Finding the right running shoe can make all the difference when it comes to comfort, performance, and injury prevention. Two popular lightweight trainers from Hoka One One are the Mach 5 and the Rincon 3. But which one is better for your specific needs?
This in-depth comparison examines the key features and performance of both shoes to help you decide which model works best for you.
The Hoka Mach 5 and the Hoka Rincon 3 are both neutral, flexible, lightweight trainers best suited for tempo runs and daily training. The Mach 5 has a softer, more cushioned midsole while the Rincon 3 prioritizes responsiveness.
Both shoes feature breathable engineered mesh uppers and external heel counters for a secure fit. The Mach 5 has a higher stack height and more overall cushioning but the Rincon 3 weighs slightly less.
This comparison looks at sizing, weight, materials, cushioning, stability, price, and real-world performance to help you choose which Hoka shoe fits your running needs.
Similarities And Differences Between Hoka Mach 5 and Rincon 3:
| Feature | Hoka Mach 5 | Hoka Rincon 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2022 | 2021 |
| Stability | Neutral | Neutral |
| Flexibility | Flexible | Flexible |
| Sizing | Men’s 7-13, Women’s 5-11 | Men’s 7-13, Women’s 5-11 |
| Weight | 7.7 oz | 6.8 oz |
| Cushioning | ProFly+ | CMEVA |
| Outsole | Rubberized EVA foam | Rubberized EVA foam |
| Midsole | ProFly+ | CMEVA |
| Upper | Engineered mesh | Engineered mesh |
| Retail Price | $140 | $125 |
Features Comparison
Materials
The Mach 5 uses a ProFly+ midsole made of a supercritical compound designed to maintain cushioning over time. The outsole utilizes zones of rubberized EVA foam for traction and durability. The engineered mesh upper provides a secure fit.
The Rincon 3 features a CMEVA midsole that is softer in the heel and firmer in the forefoot for a responsive ride. It also has a rubberized EVA foam outsole and an engineered mesh upper.
Durability
Reviewers found the Mach 5 to be slightly more durable than the Rincon 3, particularly when it comes to the outsole rubber wearing well over time. The Mach 5’s ProFly+ foam is also engineered to maintain its properties longer than standard EVA foam.
The Rincon 3’s soft foam shows signs of compression sooner than the Mach 5. The outsole rubber also wears down more quickly in high-abrasion areas. The Rincon 3 is still fairly durable for a lightweight shoe but trails the Mach 5.
Fit
Both shoes fit true to size for most runners. The Mach 5 runs slightly long while the Rincon 3 has a more dialed-in fit. The Mach 5’s upper accommodates wider feet better while the Rincon 3 provides a snugger fit overall, especially in the midfoot.
The heel counters securely lock in the foot for both models. However, the Rincon 3 has a more secure overall fit through the midsole and upper.
Stability
The Mach 5 and Rincon 3 are both categorized as neutral shoes without added stability mechanisms.
The Mach 5’s early stage Meta-Rocker Geometry provides a smooth transition but does not control pronation or medial/lateral movement. The Rincon 3 is similarly designed for neutral runners rather than overpronators.
Cushioning
Runners reported the Mach 5 provides soft, plush cushioning that maintains its properties even over several hundred miles. The ProFly+ foam gives it a very forgiving, comfortable midsole.
The Rincon 3 offers a firmer, more responsive ride. The CMEVA foam is soft in the heel but transitions to firm, responsive cushioning in the forefoot to aid performance. The Mach 5 has greater overall shock absorption.
Value
The Mach 5 costs $140 while the Rincon 3 retails for $125. Reviewers found both shoes offer good value for performance level and material quality.
The Mach 5 warrants its higher price through greater overall cushioning and longevity. However, at $25 less, the Rincon 3 still delivers a comfortable, lightweight and versatile ride.
Performance Comparison
Walking
The Mach 5 provides plush cushioning that makes walking comfortable for long distances. The early stage Meta-Rocker also facilitates a smooth heel-to-toe transition while walking.
The Rincon 3 has a firmer midsole that transmits more ground feel during walking. The responsive forefoot also provides good energy return for walking.
For all-day wear while walking, the Mach 5 may have a slight edge in comfort while the Rincon 3 promotes a natural gait. Both work well.
Running
Testers found the Mach 5 provides a highly cushioned yet responsive ride. The ample midsole absorbs shock effectively while the rockered profile feels smooth. The shoe maintains cushioning for up to 500 miles.
The Rincon 3 offers a lightweight, snappy feel at faster paces. The firmer foam provides good ground contact and push-off. The shoe excels at tempo runs and uptempo training but has less cushion for recovery runs.
For versatile training, the Mach 5 strikes a better balance while the Rincon 3 leans towards speed over cushioning.
Plantar Fasciitis
The Mach 5 provides superior cushioning from heel strike to toe-off, preventing excessive strain on the plantar fascia ligament. Reviewers with PF found it comfortable for all-day wear.
The Rincon 3 is less cushioned overall which may aggravate symptoms for some PF sufferers, especially over long distances. The added ground feel transmits more shock force through the foot.
For plantar fasciitis, the Mach 5 is likely the safer choice though individual results may vary.
Standing All Day
The Mach 5’s plush ProFly+ midsole and rockered shape maintain comfort when standing for extended periods. The engineered mesh upper also provides secure support without irritation.
While suitable for athletic performance, the Rincon 3 leans firm which can fatigue the feet over many hours of standing. The snug upper also fits more athletically than the Mach 5.
Overall, the Mach 5 is better equipped for all-day wear when standing frequently. The Rincon 3 prioritizes ground feel and response rather than cruising comfort.
Final verdict
For runners seeking a well-cushioned daily trainer who can still pick up the pace, the Hoka Mach 5 is an excellent option. It provides a smooth, comfortable ride with improved durability and secure lockdown. The ample cushioning absorbs shock for any distance.
The Rincon 3 shines when you want a lightweight, responsive feel for faster training and tempo runs. The firm foam aids ground contact and push-off while the engineered upper fits snugly. Durability takes a slight hit and overall cushioning lags the Mach 5.
Both are quality, versatile shoes. But the Mach 5’s extra comfort and shock absorption gives it an advantage for most runners. If you only want one Hoka for both daily miles and uptempo days, the Mach 5 is likely the better all-around choice.