Finding the right running shoe can make all the difference in your performance and comfort on the road or trail. Two of the latest models – the Hoka Mach 6 and the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 – both offer responsive rides and versatile use at a premium price point. But how do they compare when put head to head?
In this in-depth comparison, we’ll break down the key features and performance of the Hoka Mach 6 and Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 to help you decide which is the better option for your running needs.
Similarities And Differences Between Hoka Mach 6 And Endorphin Speed 4:
| Feature | Hoka Mach 6 | Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2024 | 2024 |
| Weight | Approx. 8.2 oz for men’s size 9 | Approx. 8.2 oz for men’s size 9 |
| Heel Drop | 5mm drop | 8mm drop |
| Stability | MetaRocker technology in outsole promotes smooth transitions | Moderate stability from XT-900 outsole and midsole guidance line |
| Upper | Engineered mesh for secure, comfortable fit | Zonal engineered mesh for breathability |
| Midsole | ProFly+ foam balances cushioning and response | PWRRUN PB foam with embedded nylon plate |
| Outsole | Rubber outsole with MetaRocker technology | High abrasion rubber XT-900 in lattice pattern |
| Price | $140 MSRP | $227 MSRP |
Feature Comparision:
Materials and Construction:
The Mach 6 uses a breathable mesh upper with strategic support pieces for a secure fit. The standout is the new ProFly+ foam in the midsole, which is designed to be lightweight and responsive while still delivering that signature Hoka cushioning. The rubber outsole incorporates MetaRocker technology in the shape to promote smooth transitions.
The Endorphin Speed 4 also has an engineered mesh upper for breathability, this time with zonal support. It includes a PWRRUN PB foam midsole that is softer than previous versions but still snappy thanks to the embedded nylon plate. The high-abrasion rubber outsole uses Saucony’s XT-900 material in a lattice configuration for added stability.
Durability:
Both shoes use premium materials in their construction that are made to go the distance. The Endorphin Speed 4 does have more coverage in its outsole that may give it a slight edge in high-wear areas, but robust foams and quality mesh uppers in both models result in good durability for typical training miles.
Fit and Comfort:
Runners report that Mach 6 fits true to size in a medium width through the midfoot and toe box. The engineered mesh upper provides a comfortable, secure feel.
The Endorphin Speed 4 has a wider fit, especially in the toe box, making it a good option for runners needing more room. However, some report the integrated tongue can irritate faster paces. Both provide adequate room in the toe box for most foot shapes.
Stability:
The Mach 6 isn’t designed as a stability shoe per se, but the MetaRocker outsole does promote smooth transitions from heel to toe for a stable feel.
The Endorphin Speed 4 provides moderate stability features from its XT-900 outsole and guidance line along the midsole, giving it good performance for neutral runners. Neither model has extreme stability mechanisms that would correct severe overpronation.
Cushioning:
The ProFly+ foam in the Mach 6 offers soft cushioning with impressive energy return, while still maintaining ground feel and response. There’s enough cushion for recovery days or long miles, but it’s not overly plush.
The PWRRUN PB foam in the Endorphin Speed 4 remains a standout for its soft, bouncy cushioning. The nylon plate adds pop, though some may find it slightly less responsive than previous Endorphin versions.
Value/Price:
With an MSRP of $140, the Mach 6 comes in lower than most premium trainers on the market. The sophistication of the foam and use of MetaRocker technology make this a strong value.
In contrast, the Endorphin Speed 4 retails for $227, a high price tag. The proven midsole foam and versatility of the shoe help justify the price, but it is a more significant investment.
Performance Comparison:
for Walking:
The Mach 6’s plush cushioning and rocker design make it a comfortable choice for walking sessions, though some may find it a touch unstable at slower paces. The Endorphin Speed 4 has good shock absorption, but its snappy feel isn’t ideal for casual walks.
for Running:
For running, the Mach 6 shines as a cushioned daily trainer that can pick up the pace. The rocker geometry provides a smooth transition while the ProFly+ foam keeps energy high.
The Endorphin Speed 4 is slightly softer, but its responsive plate makes it ideal for everything from tempo runs to marathons. It’s a particularly strong choice for fast-paced training and racing.
for Plantar Fasciitis:
The plush cushioning of the Mach 6 helps absorb shock for those with plantar fasciitis and other sensitivities. The lower drop also encourages a more natural foot strike. While also cushioned, the Endorphin Speed 4 may not be quite as forgiving on painful feet due to its snappier performance plate.
for Standing All Day:
Cushioning is key for standing all-day comfort, and the Mach 6 delivers here. This makes it a great option for jobs that require hours on your feet like nursing or retail. The Endorphin Speed 4 has plush cushioning too, but its unstable rounded heel and snappy plate make it less ideal for this purpose.
Final verdict:
In the battle between the Hoka Mach 6 and the Saucony Endorphin Speed 4, choosing the right shoe ultimately comes down to your running needs and preferences.
For runners seeking maximum cushioning for recovery days or shoes that can multitask for walking, the Mach 6 is the winner. Its ProFly+ foam and rocker geometry make it uniquely comfortable while still performing well during faster sessions.
If you’re looking for more of a versatile high-performance trainer that can handle everything from long runs to race day, the Endorphin Speed 4 takes the prize with its impressively lightweight yet bouncy PWRRUN PB cushioning and embedded plate. Just be prepared to pay more for its premium features.
No matter which you choose, both the Hoka Mach 6 and Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 represent strong options that will keep your feet happy mile after mile. Analyze your gait, comfort needs, and intended uses to decide which is the better match.