If you’re a runner searching for your next pair of shoes, you may be trying to decide between the Asics Gel Nimbus 26 and the Hoka Bondi 8.
Both are cushioned neutral daily trainers, but they have key differences that may make one a better choice for your needs. This in-depth comparison highlights the specs, features, and performance of each to help you choose the best option.
Similarities And Differences Between Bondi 8 And Nimbus 26
| Feature | Asics Gel Nimbus 26 | Hoka Bondi 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2024 | 2022 |
| Stability | A hint of stability | Very stable |
| Flexibility | Not very flexible | Rigid |
| Sizing | Men’s 7-13, Women’s 5-12 | Available in both men’s and women’s sizes |
| Weight | 9.2 oz (women’s), 10.7 oz (men’s) | 10.8 oz (306 g) |
| Cushion | Moderate, FF BLASTTM PLUS ECO | Highly cushioned |
| Outsole | Ahar+ rubber | Zonal rubber |
| Midsole | FF BLASTTM PLUS ECO | CMEVA |
| Upper | Breathable mesh | Mesh |
| Retail Price | $160 | $165 |
Features Comparison
Materials
The Asics Gel Nimbus 26 features a breathable mesh upper to allow airflow to your feet. The midsole uses Asics’ FlyteFoam BLASTTM PLUS ECO technology for responsive cushioning. The outsole is made of AHAR+ rubber for durability and traction.
The Hoka Bondi 8 has a seamless mesh upper for a secure and irritation-free fit. The midsole uses compression molded EVA foam for soft cushioning from heel to toe. The zonal rubber outsole reinforces high-wear areas for increased durability.
Durability
The Asics Gel Nimbus 26 is built to last, with AHAR+ rubber extending throughout the outsole to resist abrasion even on rough surfaces. The FlyteFoam midsole retains its properties over time better than standard EVA foam.
Similarly, the Hoka Bondi 8 has a durable high-abrasion rubber in the outsole to handle many miles of use. The full-compression midsole EVA is softer than Asics’ foam, which some runners find breaks down faster.
Fit
The Asics Gel Nimbus 26 runs true to size for most runners, with a wider fit through the forefoot and toe box. The padded tongue and collar lock down the midfoot comfortably. It accommodates many foot shapes.
The Hoka Bondi 8 fits snugger through the heel and midfoot due to the mesh upper and integrated tongue. The toe box is more tapered than the Asics.
Stability
While designed for neutral runners, the Asics Gel Nimbus 26 provides some subtle stability from its well-balanced midsole and outsole design. Guidance Line technology also encourages a straighter foot strike.
With its wide, flared midsole and lower 4mm drop, the Hoka Bondi 8 offers inherent stability for most runners. The wider platform absorbs force smoothly from heel to toe without wobbling.
Cushioning
The Asics Gel Nimbus 26 provides a moderate level of cushioning that is soft without feeling too squishy or unstable. The forefoot Gel pads attenuate shock, while the FlyteFoam BLASTTM midsole gives responsive bounce.
The Hoka Bondi 8 maximizes cushioning with its thick midsole and padded mesh upper. The soft ride makes it feel like running on clouds, nicely absorbing impact while smoothing out the ride. The high cushioning comes at the cost of ground-feel, however.
Value
At $160, the Asics Gel Nimbus 26 is competitively priced for the technologies and materials used. Runners get a durable, supportive daily trainer from a proven brand.
The $165 Hoka Bondi 8 costs a little more for its maximal cushioning approach using a thick slab of EVA. While both provide good value, runners needing more cushion may find the extra $5 worthwhile.
Performance Comparison
Walking
The Asics Gel Nimbus 26 has a stable platform that makes it comfortable for walking. The upper breathes well and doesn’t cause hot spots, even when worn without socks. The outsole grips well on smooth and uneven surfaces alike.
Similarly, the thick cushioning of the Hoka Bondi 8 absorbs impact nicely during walking. The rockered sole encourages a natural roll through each step. The shoe is less breathable than the Asics for sockless use, however.
Running
During runs, the Asics Gel Nimbus 26 provides a smooth, moderately cushioned ride. The energetic foam offers light bounce while the Guidance Line technology promotes an efficient gait cycle. It handles tempo runs and long distances fairly well.
The highly cushioned Hoka Bondi 8 excels at recovery runs, long distances, and easy paces. The soft ride does suffer at faster speeds, where the foam can feel more sluggish. The rockered profile helps move you forward efficiently during each step.
Plantar Fasciitis
The Asics Gel Nimbus 26 can aid runners with plantar fasciitis thanks to its cushioned heel, Guidance Line to reduce pronation, and ample toe room. Those needing more arch support may require an aftermarket insert.
The thick cushioning and beveled heel of the Hoka Bondi 8 help absorb shock that can aggravate plantar fasciitis. The lower drop also encourages less heel strike compared to a traditional 12mm running shoe.
Standing All Day
The Asics Gel Nimbus 26 provides good comfort for extended standing with its moderate cushioning and padded collar. The insole lacks prominent arch support found in some other shoes, however. Wearing orthotics would enhance comfort.
Due to its plush cushioning and wider base, the Hoka Bondi 8 helps reduce fatigue from prolonged standing or walking. The foot remains positioned neutrally to minimize aches in the arches and joints. It works well for those on their feet all day.
Final Verdict:
For neutral runners seeking a responsive yet cushioned daily trainer, the Asics Gel Nimbus 26 is an excellent choice with proven technologies. It provides versatile performance for training runs at most paces.
The Hoka Bondi 8 is ideal for those wanting maximum cushioning for recovery days, long distances, and walking. The soft ride comes at the expense of ground-feel and agility, however.
Lastly, Consider your goals, typical running paces, foot shape, and any orthotic needs when deciding between these two comfortable trainers.
