Finding the right running shoe can make all the difference in your performance and comfort on the run. Two popular neutral cushioned trainers on the market are the Brooks Ghost 15 and the Hoka Mach 5.
Both provide soft cushioning and smooth rides, but they have key differences that may make one better suited for your individual needs. Read on for a detailed comparison of these two great shoes.
Similarities And Differences Between Brooks Ghost 15 And Hoka Mach 5:
| Specs | Brooks Ghost 15 | Hoka Mach 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2022 | 2022 |
| Stability | Medium | Low |
| Flexibility | Medium | High |
| Sizing | True to size | Runs small |
| Weight | 9.8 oz | 7.6 oz |
| Cushion | Plush | Soft |
| Outsole | Blown rubber | RMAT rubber |
| Midsole | DNA Loft v2 | ProFly |
| Upper | Engineered mesh | Engineered mesh |
| Retail Price | $140 | $140 |
Features Comparison:
We are now going to see how the features of both models compare against each other. This will help you make an ideal choice between the Ghost 15 and Mach 5.
Materials:
The Brooks Ghost 15 uses a blown rubber outsole which provides good durability and traction. The midsole utilizes Brooks’ DNA Loft v2 foam which gives a plush, soft feel underfoot. The engineered mesh upper provides a secure and breathable fit.
In contrast, the Hoka Mach 5 has an RMAT rubber outsole, ProFly midsole foam, and an engineered mesh upper. The RMAT rubber is lightweight but less durable than the Ghost 15’s outsole.
Durability:
The Ghost 15 wins when it comes to durability, thanks to its sturdy blown rubber outsole. This allows the shoe to hold up well for many miles of training and racing.
The Mach 5’s RMAT outsole tends to show signs of wear much quicker in comparison. The Mach 5’s upper is also less likely to hold its structural integrity over time.
Fit:
Both shoes run true to size in the mid and forefoot, but the Mach 5 runs smaller in the toe box area. The Ghost 15 will fit a wider range of foot shapes comfortably compared to the snugger Mach 5. The Ghost 15’s engineered mesh upper is softer and more forgiving, while the Mach 5’s engineered mesh doesn’t stretch as easily.
Stability:
The Ghost 15 provides better stability than the Mach 5 due to its wider platform and midsole foam that resists compression.
Though both are neutral shoes, overpronators are more likely to feel their feet rolling inward in the Mach 5. The Mach 5’s narrower fit also reduces lateral stability.
Cushioning:
While both shoes offer soft cushioning, the Ghost 15 provides a plusher feel underfoot that helps reduce impact shock and keep legs fresher. The DNA Loft v2 foam maintains its cushioning properties better throughout a run versus the Mach 5’s ProFly foam. However, the Mach 5 provides a greater sense of energy return and responsiveness.
Value for Money:
Considering durability, cushioning, and stability, the Brooks Ghost 15 delivers better value at its price point versus the Hoka Mach 5.
Runners are likely to get more miles out of the Ghost 15 before needing to replace them.
Performance Comparison:
In this segment we are going to see how the performance of both runners excel. after this we will also tell you our Final Verdict so read on to find out what we recommend.
Walking:
For walking and casual wear, the Ghost 15 is the clear winner. Its plush DNA Loft foam and smooth heel-to-toe transition make walking comfortable for long periods.
The Mach 5 doesn’t provide enough stability or cushioning to make an ideal walking shoe. Its narrow fit and snug upper also causes discomfort when walking.
Running:
For pure running performance, the Mach 5 takes the lead. Its ProFly midsole provides better energy return for a responsive, propulsive toe-off during faster paces.
The Mach 5 is over half an ounce lighter than the Ghost 15, making it feel quicker and more nimble during tempos and races. However, the Ghost 15 is the better choice for recovery runs and long distances thanks to its softer cushioning.
Plantar Fasciitis:
The Ghost 15 is likely the better choice for runners with plantar fasciitis. Its ample cushioning helps absorb shock that can worsen inflammation, while its roomy toe box avoids squeezing the foot.
The Mach 5’s lower drop also increases strain on the plantar fascia. However, the Mach 5 may work for mild cases if properly fitted.
Standing All Day:
Without a doubt, the Ghost 15 is more comfortable for standing all day. Its DNA Loft foam maintains plush cushioning even during prolonged standing, reducing fatigue.
The roomy fit avoids hot spots or pinching. In contrast, the Mach 5 lacks the cushioning and support needed for extended periods on your feet. Its narrow fit will also cause discomfort.
Final Verdict:
For most runners, the Brooks Ghost 15 is the better all-around neutral trainer. It provides excellent cushioning and stability in a comfortable package built to last. The Ghost 15 works well for daily miles, long runs, recovery runs, and walking.
While not as fast and propulsive as the Mach 5, it’s a more versatile shoe. The Hoka Mach 5 is better suited for runners who want a lightweight, low-drop shoe for faster workouts and racing. Its snugger fit and less durable materials make it less ideal for heavier training and walking.
Consider your needs and running style, but the Ghost 15 fits the bill for a wider range of runners.