Hoka Arahi 7 VS Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23: What Should I Buy?

Finding the right running shoe that matches your foot type and training needs is key to preventing injury and improving performance. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and Hoka Arahi 7 are two leading stability shoes that provide supportive cushioning for overpronators, but they differ in their technologies, materials, and overall feel.

This in-depth comparison examines all the nitty-gritty details between the shoes to help you determine which one is the better fit for your feet and running goals. Read on to learn which shoe comes out on top!

Similarities And Differences Between Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and Hoka Arahi 7:

FeaturesBrooks Adrenaline GTS 23Hoka Arahi 7
Launched In20232024
StabilityGuideRails 23 technologyJ-frame technology
FlexibilityLess flexibleSome flexibility
SizingMen’s 7-13, Women’s 5-11Standard sizing
Weight10.3 oz (M), 8.6 oz (W)9.9 oz (M), 8.1 oz (W)
CushionModerate BioMoGo DNA Loft v2Firm, compression-molded EVA
OutsoleBlown rubberRubber
MidsoleBioMoGo DNA Loft v2 with GuideRails 23Compression-molded EVA with J-frame
UpperEngineered mesh with 3D Fit PrintFlat-knit fabric
Retail Price$140$145

Features Comparison


The Adrenaline GTS 23 utilizes a blown rubber outsole for durability and traction across different surfaces, a BioMoGo DNA Loft v2 midsole foam for responsive cushioning, and an engineered mesh upper with 3D Fit Print for adaptive support.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23


The Arahi 7 features a rubber outsole rubber, a J-Frame and compression molded EVA midsole, and a flat-knit fabric upper.


Testers note that the Adrenaline GTS 23 provides excellent durability even for higher mileages thanks to features like the durable blown rubber outsole.

The Arahi 7 is also built to last long distances, but some testers feel the midsole foam may compress quicker than the DNA Loft foam in the Adrenaline.


The Adrenaline GTS 23 fits securely while accommodating different foot shapes with its 3D Fit Print mesh upper and plush internal lining.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS Top View


The Arahi 7 runs true to size for most in a standard width. Some may find the knit upper on the Arahi 7 less adaptive than the 3D Fit upper of the Adrenaline.


Both shoes provide excellent stability for overpronators but use different systems. The Adrenaline GTS 23 uses GuideRails 23 technology – a rigid rail system that prevents excessive rolling inwards.

The Arahi 7 utilizes a J-Frame system in the midsole to guide and stabilize foot motions. Those needing more significant stability features may prefer the GuideRails.


The Adrenaline GTS 23 offers high-quality cushioning that provides both responsiveness for performance and shock attenuation for comfort during longer runs.

The Arahi 7 has a firmer ride than the DNA Loft foam in the Adrenaline, which some runners noted makes them less cushioned for higher mileage.


At $140, the Adrenaline GTS 23 costs $5 less than the Arahi 7 – making it not a big difference given its high-end stability technology and cushioning.

All in all the Adrenaline 23 provides excellent support and comfort at a slightly less price point compared to the Arahi 7.

Performance Comparison:


The Adrenaline GTS 23 provides a smooth and comfortable walking stride thanks to its responsive DNA Loft cushioning and stable GuideRails technology.

The Arahi 7 is also adept at walking distances with its stabilizing frame, but some may find it less cushy than the Adrenaline for all-day wear.


When used for regular training runs, both models provide excellent support for overpronators across different paces. The Adrenaline GTS 23 offers a particularly smooth and stable ride that adapts well to both slow jogs and quicker tempo runs.

The Arahi 7 is also a capable stability running shoe, but is geared more towards daily mileage than faster paces.

Plantar Fasciitis

The Adrenaline GTS 23 supplies good arch support from its BioMoGo DNA Loft foam, making it a nice choice for runners struggling with plantar fasciitis inflammation and heel pain.

However, the Arahi 7 seems better equipped specifically for plantar fasciitis with its firmer foam and stability frame putting less strain on the plantar fascia ligament.

Standing All Day

The Adrenaline GTS 23 has been tested to promote less fatigue even after hours of standing thanks to the DNA Loft cushioning underfoot.

The Arahi 7 can also make lengthy standing more comfortable, but some may find the midsole lacks the plushness necessary for all-day wear in comparison.

Final Verdict:

Overall, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 comes out narrowly ahead as the better stability running shoe. For only $140, it supplies adaptive support and cushioning making it a versatile option for overpronators across different running paces and distances.

While pricier, the Hoka Arahi 7 still performs well – with its stabilizing J-Frame midsole and durable construction that can log daily miles.

If prioritizing value and well-balanced cushioning, the Adrenaline GTS 23 is likely the superior choice. But more competitive runners who appreciate a firm ride with precise stability may still gravitate towards the Arahi 7.

Leave a comment