The Hoka One One Rincon quickly became a fan favorite after its launch in 2019. Its responsive cushioning and lightweight feel made it a versatile shoe for various runs.
In 2020, Hoka released the Rincon 2 – an update aiming to improve durability and snugness while retaining the Rincon’s signature features.
But how exactly do the two versions compare? Read on as we dive into a detailed face-off on features, performance testing, and more to help you decide which Rincon is the better pick for you.
Similarities And Differences Between Hoka Rincon 1 and Hoka Rincon 2:
| Feature | Hoka Rincon 1 | Hoka Rincon 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched In | 2019 | 2020 |
| Stability | Neutral | Neutral |
| Flexibility | Moderate | Moderate |
| Sizing | Men’s 7-13, Women’s 5-11 | Same |
| Weight | 6.9 oz (men’s), 5.9 oz (women’s) | 7.1 oz (men’s), 5.7 oz (women’s) |
| Cushioning | High | High |
| Outsole | Durable rubber | Reinforced rubber in high-wear areas |
| Midsole | PROFLYTM foam | Same + extended sidewalls |
| Upper | Engineered mesh | Engineered air mesh |
| Retail Price | $160 | $131 |
Features Comparison
Materials
The outsole rubber on the Rincon 2 has been reinforced in high-wear areas to improve durability. Both versions use PROFLYTM foam in the midsole for responsive cushioning.
However, the Rincon 2 extends the sidewalls of the midsole to enhance softness and support. The engineered mesh upper on the original gets upgraded to an engineered air mesh upper on the 2 for better breathability and structure.
Durability
With its reinforced outsole rubber and redesigned midsole sidewalls, the Rincon 2 clearly bests the Rincon in durability based on testing.
This helps the shoe better maintain cushioning and support over more miles of wear. The original Rincon struggled with premature midsole breakdown in some testers.
Fit
The Rincon 2 tweaks the shape to enhance heel security while keeping an overall roomy toe box fit. Most testers found it runs true-to-size.
A new optional strap helps dial in midfoot security as needed. The Rincon fits comfortably for most as well, though some report heel slippage over long miles.
Cushioning
The PROFLYTM foam and early-stage Meta-Rocker sole provide plush cushioning in both models. However, the Rincon 2’s extended midsole boosts softness for better shock absorption, especially on longer hauls.
This gives it a cushioning advantage that better protects muscles and joints without excess bulk.
Value
With identical retail pricing, the Rincon 2 provides better value with its upgrades enhancing durability and cushioning. You gain shoe improvements over the original model at no extra cost. While the Rincon still wins praise from loyal fans, most agree the 2 is the smarter long-term investment.
Performance Comparison
For Walking
In testing, both Rincons perform admirably as walking shoes thanks to ample cushioning. The PROFLYTM foam absorbs impact to keep feet comfortable for long neighborhood strolls or mall outings.
The Rincon 2’s softer heel and forefoot cushion slightly eclipses the Rincon here. But either version steadies your stride nicely in a lightweight, breathable package.
For Running
Testers overwhelmingly give the advantage to the Rincon 2 for logging plenty of miles. The extended midsole softness balances responsive cushioning for varied paces, while outsole rubber reinforcements grip well on tarmac or light trails. The original Rincon remains a respectable lightweight trainer but doesn’t stand up over hundreds of miles quite like the 2.
Final Verdict
The Hoka Rincon 2 makes incremental improvements in comfort, stability, and durability to create an even more versatile lightweight trainer.
The upgrades cement it as the new gold standard successor to what was already an acclaimed shoe. If investing in a durable long-haul runner that excels on roads and light trails at any distance or pace, the Rincon 2 is arguably worth the switch.
Let me know if you would like any other changes to the formatting or text bolding!