Saucony Ride 17 VS Triumph 21: What Should I Buy?

If you’re a runner searching for your next reliable daily trainer, the Saucony Ride 17 and Saucony Triumph 21 are two of the latest offerings that should be on your radar. Both shoes provide exceptional comfort and versatility to carry you through everything from easy jogs to long-distance runs.

In this comprehensive comparison guide, we’ll analyze the key features of the Ride 17 and Triumph 21, see how they stack up across critical performance metrics, and determine which shoe is the better choice depending on your individual needs and preferences. Read on to find out if the Ride 17 or Triumph 21 will be your new favorite pair of running shoes!

Similarities And Differences Between Saucony Ride 17 And Triumph 21:

FeatureSaucony Ride 17Saucony Triumph 21
Launched In20242023
StabilityNeutralNeutral
FlexibilityFlexibleFlexible
SizingTrue to sizeRuns small, order 1/2 size up
Weight10.6 oz10 oz
CushionPWRRUN+ foam, well-cushionedPWRRUN+ foam, highly cushioned
OutsoleCarbon rubberXT-900 Carbon Rubber
MidsolePWRRUN+ foamPWRRUN+ foam
UpperBreathable meshSoft, flat knit
Retail Price$140$160

Feature Comparision:

Material:

Both shoes utilize Saucony’s XT-900 carbon rubber on the outsoles to resist abrasion, with the Triumph 21 integrating additional flex grooves for an enhanced transition. The midsoles feature the PWRRUN+ foam which delivers a cushy yet lively underfoot feel.

SAUCONY RIDE 17
RIDE 17

Saucony Triumph 21
TRIUMPH 21

The uppers differentiate the models – the Ride 17 uses a breathable mesh fabric, while the Triumph 21 incorporates a seamless flat knit material for a supple sock-like fit yet retains more warmth. These material selections provide a balanced blend of cushioning, support, and ventilation.

Durability:

In testing, both the Ride 17 and Triumph 21 prove impressively durable in construction to withstand serious mileage. The buoyant PWRRUN+ foam retains its springy properties with minimal packing out or flattening, even after extensive use.

Additionally, the thick carbon rubber coverage throughout high-abrasion zones on the outsoles continues griping effectively with only typical wear over time. The tightly knit mesh upper of the Ride 17 resists degradation slightly better compared to the Triumph 21’s softer flat knit fabric, which could develop small holes or loose threads earlier into its lifecycle.

Still, either option should supply several hundred satisfying miles before a replacement is warranted.

Fit:

Runners report the Ride 17 fits true-to-size in most cases, with sufficient roominess in the toe box to allow natural foot splaying paired with adjustable laces to customize a dialed-in midfoot wrap.

SAUCONY RIDE 17 TOP VIEW
RIDE 17 TOP VIEW

Saucony Triumph 21 TOP VIEW
TRIUMPH 21 TOP VIEW

Meanwhile, the Triumph 21 runs small according to user feedback – trying a half size up from your normal running shoe size is recommended to attain the ideal relaxed fit this model strives for.

Additionally, the flat knit upper with its inherent lack of structure caters to runners interested specifically in a more forgiving fit with some extra volume, rather than a precision locked-in feel.

Stability:

As neutral trainers without pronounced correction or guidance features, both the Ride 17 and Triumph 21 promote smooth transitions for neutral runners. Despite the high stack height of the Triumph 21 which could potentially feel unstable, its broad outsole platform keeps it feeling flat and steady enough even during abrupt lateral maneuvers.

Still, the Ride 17 provides the greater overall stability of the two models. While less stable than racing flats, either option here gives enough support for heavier neutral trainers to rely on for their daily mileage needs.

Cushioning:

The well-cushioned Ride 17 supplies a soft ride that responds rapidly without excessive bounce. Its thick foam midsole smoothly absorbs impact to keep your feet feeling fresh across daily training miles.

With an even higher stack height, the Triumph 21 provides plusher cushioning that ranks among the most generous in the Saucony lineup. Its lively PWRRUN+ foam gives back energy in the form of snappy responsiveness to make your runs feel lighter and easier.

Testers note this exceptionally soft cushioning makes the Triumph 21 optimal for recovery days and long runs when you want to float easily over the miles without brutalizing your body.

Value:

At $140, the versatile and durable Ride 17 is an excellent value for runners wanting an everyday trainer. The consistent cushioning allows using them for both short and long runs.

The Triumph 21 costs $160, reflecting its ultra-premium cushioning and knit upper construction. For runners prioritizing a soft and springy feel above all else, the price seems fair. But there are other options if seeking value takes precedence.

Performance Comparision:

Walking:

The Ride 17 and Triumph 21 are both suitable as walking shoes, but the Triumph 21’s ultra-soft foam midsole is somewhat less efficient for walking than the more minimally cushioned Ride 17 since there is just too much cushioning to effectively progress through the full heel to toe gait.

The more moderate cushioning of the Ride 17 allows a smoother transition making it the superior choice specifically for all-day walking use cases.

Running:

Both models are engineered for running and excel well in that use case, with the Ride 17 leaning more towards versatile cushioning for all distances and paces, suitable as a balanced daily trainer with a consistent, reliable ride.

Compared to that steady versatility, the Triumph 21 is speedier for uptempo running or tempo runs, with testers noting its abundant foam cushioning and responsiveness supplies superior bounce to encourage a quicker turnover driving faster paces.

Plantar Fasciitis:

The ample cushioning of the Ride 17 absorbs shock smoothly, which helps relieve pain in the feet and heels caused by plantar fasciitis inflammation. Its lower drop also encourages a gentler heel strike.

The Triumph 21 provides ample cushion but is too soft underfoot to be stable for vulnerable feet. However, its added lift does cushion heel strikes known for exacerbating the plantar fascia tissue damage.

All Day Standing:

The soft foam cushioning of the Triumph 21 makes it unsuitable for stable all-day support or walking use cases, tending to break down faster than the Ride 17 under extended strain.

The Ride 17 is more durable with enough cushion for comfort but sufficient firmness to provide fatigue-reducing support if you need to stand or walk for prolonged periods like in work or travel scenarios. Its stability keeps feet happier.

Final Verdict:

In the end, the Saucony Triumph 21 takes the crown if pursuing an exceptionally responsive and cushy running shoe tailored specifically for neutral runners. It offers the ultimate in plushness to make running feel effortless at any distance.


But for a more versatile trainer accommodating runs plus walking, gym sessions, or standing all day, the Saucony Ride 17 can’t be beaten. Boasting well-balanced cushioning along with a secure and breathable upper, it transitions seamlessly between various activities – all at an affordable price.

So choose the Ride 17 if you want just one durable, comfortable pair handling every activity. Or splurge on the Triumph 21 if you desire unparalleled softness for your runs without breaking the bank on carbon-plated racers. Either way, you can’t go wrong trusting Saucony to log mile after happy mile.

Leave a comment