Hoka Clifton 9 VS Asics GT 2000 11: What Should I Buy?

Looking for a new pair of running shoes? The Hoka One One Clifton 9 and Asics GT 2000 11 are two of the most popular options on the market in 2023.

Both shoes offer high levels of cushioning and support, but there are some key differences that runners should consider before choosing between the two.

This in-depth comparison covers all the details on materials, stability, fit, cushioning, and performance so you can decide which of these premium running shoes is the better choice for your training needs. Whether you’re a neutral runner or need stability, read on to see how the Clifton 9 and GT 2000 11 stack up!

Similarities And Differences Between Hoka Clifton 9 And Asics GT 2000 11:

FeaturesHoka One One Clifton 9Asics GT 2000 11
Launched In20232023
StabilityVery stableModerate stability
FlexibilityFlexibleModerate flexibility
SizingNarrow fitMedium fit
Weight8.7 oz10.5 oz
CushioningHighly cushionedModerate to high cushioning
OutsoleRubberAHAR+ rubber
MidsoleCMEVAFF Blast and LiteTruss
UpperEngineered knit meshJacquard mesh
Retail Price$145$140

Features Comparison:

Below we will see how to features of Clifton 9 differ from the well known Asics GT 2000 11.


The Hoka Clifton 9 utilizes a lightweight but highly durable engineered knit mesh for the upper, which provides breathability and flexibility. The outsole is made of high-abrasion rubber to handle mileage. The expanded CMEVA foam midsole gives it that signature Hoka plush cushioning.

Clifton 9

Asics GT 2000 11
GT 2000 11

The Asics GT 2000 11 also has a breathable jacquard mesh upper. Its midsole combines ASICS’ FlyteFoam Blast foam with its LiteTruss technology for responsive cushioning and torsional stability. The outsole uses AHAR+ rubber for enhanced durability in high-wear areas.


Both shoes are built to last, with rubber outsoles and durable mesh uppers. Testers found the Clifton 9’s outsole rubber to be grippy yet durable, while the GT 2000 11 has ASICS’ special AHAR+ rubber placed strategically for improved longevity. The meshes should hold up well to regular running. Overall, durability is comparable between the two.


The Clifton 9 runs narrower than the GT 2000 11, especially in the toe box. The Asics provides a more spacious forefoot fit for wider feet.

Clifton 9 Top View

Asics GT 2000 11 TOP VIEW
GT 2000 11 TOP VIEW

Both have medium-volume uppers, but the Clifton fits snugger throughout. For those with narrow to average-width feet, the Clifton 9 will provide a sock-like fit. Go up a half-size if between widths or towards the wider side.


While the Clifton 9 is neutral, it provides notable midsole stability for transitioning smoothly through the gait cycle. The curved ‘rocker’ shape promotes foot control.

In contrast, the GT 2000 11 is specifically designed as a stability shoe, using ASICS’ Dynamic DuoMax technology to prevent overpronation and support neutral gaits. It takes the lead for runners needing moderate stability.


Offering Hoka’s renowned ‘marshmallow-like’ soft cushioning, the Clifton 9 has a thicker midsole stack (5mm drop) than the GT 2000 11 (8mm drop). Testers found it provided plush, long-lasting comfort over high mileage.

The GT 2000 11 offers slightly firmer cushioning but still maintains softness using FlyteFoam Blast. Both deliver responsive cushioning, but the Clifton 9 wins for pillowy softness.

Value for Money

The Clifton 9 costs around $145, while the GT 2000 11 retails at $140. Considering the exceptional comfort and versatility of the Clifton 9 as a cushioned daily trainer, most runners felt it was worth the investment. The GT 2000 11 is ideal for those wanting stability without breaking the bank. Overall, both deliver features to justify their price tags.

Performance Comparison:

Now we will analyze performance of these two Solid Runners to help you identify which is better for you.


The plush Clifton 9 is like walking on clouds, while the GT 2000 11 also provides cushioned comfort in walking sessions. The stability mechanics of the Asics are less necessary for walking, making the Hoka’s ultra-soft midsole the highlight here. The Clifton wins for supreme walking comfort.


The bouncy Clifton 9 is hard to beat for neutral runners, providing soft landings over any distance. The curved shape encourages smooth transitions. The GT 2000 11 suits overpronators better, promoting an even gait cycle with its stability features. For runners needing support, the Asics is the clear choice.

Plantar Fasciitis

The Clifton 9’s well-cushioned profile minimizes pressure on the feet, helping reduce plantar fasciitis pain. Reviewers with PF found it comfortable for inflamed feet. The GT 2000 11 also supports PF, but testers preferred Clifton’s plushness through the heel and arch. For PF, the Clifton 9 is ideal.

All Day Standing

Cushioning is crucial for all-day comfort, and the Clifton 9 delivers with its pillowy midsole foam that retains softness for hours. The curved shape also helps rock the foot forward for natural movement. While the GT 2000 11 is also cushioned, its firmer ride doesn’t isolate shocks as well. For standing all day, the Clifton 9 is the winner.

Final Verdict:

For neutral runners seeking unmatched cushioning, the Hoka One One Clifton 9 is the clear choice between the two shoes. Its super-plush expanded CMEVA midsole, rockered curved shape, and comfortable upper provide an exceptionally smooth and cushioned ride that can go the distance.

However, stability seekers who need pronation control will benefit more from the Asics GT 2000 11. With technologies like the Dynamic DuoMax Support System and LiteTruss shank, it help guide overpronators to a more neutral gait cycle.

So choose the Clifton 9 if you want featherweight softness underfoot, and pick the GT 2000 11 if you prefer tuned support.

Leave a comment